The Disruptor Pattern¶
Internals — for context only
This page describes how the C++ engine delivers events between threads. If you write strategies in Python, Node.js, or Codon, you don't see any of this directly — you just receive events in your callbacks. Read this if you want to understand why FLOX scales the way it does, not because you need it to write code.
Why FLOX uses ring buffers for event delivery.
The Problem¶
Traditional publish-subscribe systems have bottlenecks:
flowchart LR
P[Producer] --> Q[Queue]
Q --> C[Consumer]
Q -.->|Contention| X[Locks<br/>Allocations<br/>Cache misses]
For each event:
- Lock acquisition — Wait for mutex
- Memory allocation — Create queue node
- Cache invalidation — Producer and consumer fight over cache lines
At millions of events per second, these costs add up.
The Disruptor Solution¶
The Disruptor pattern (from LMAX Exchange) eliminates these costs:
Key insights:
- Pre-allocated array — No allocation during publishing
- Sequence numbers — Atomic counters replace locks
- Cache-line padding — False sharing eliminated
- Batching — Consumers can process multiple events
FLOX Implementation¶
FLOX's EventBus implements a Disruptor-style ring buffer:
template <typename Event,
size_t CapacityPow2 = config::DEFAULT_EVENTBUS_CAPACITY,
size_t MaxConsumers = config::DEFAULT_EVENTBUS_MAX_CONSUMERS>
class EventBus : public ISubsystem;
Publishing¶
// Producer claims slot via atomic increment
int64_t seq = _next.fetch_add(1);
// Wait for consumers to free the slot
while (seq - CapacityPow2 > minConsumerSequence()) {
backoff.pause();
}
// Write event directly into ring buffer
_storage[seq & Mask] = event;
_published[seq & Mask].store(seq); // Signal consumers
Consuming¶
Each consumer runs in a dedicated thread:
while (running) {
// Wait for next sequence
while (_published[seq & Mask] != seq) {
backoff.pause();
}
// Process event
listener->onTrade(_storage[seq & Mask]);
// Advance sequence
_consumers[i].seq.store(seq);
}
Sequence Gating¶
Producers wait for the slowest consumer before overwriting slots:
sequenceDiagram
participant P as Producer
participant RB as Ring Buffer
participant CA as Consumer A
participant CB as Consumer B
Note over RB: Capacity = 8
P->>RB: publish(seq=107)
RB-->>P: Wait! Slot 99 (107-8) not consumed
Note over CA: seq = 105
Note over CB: seq = 102 (slowest)
CB->>RB: consume(seq=103)
Note over CB: seq = 103
RB-->>P: Slot 99 free, continue
P->>RB: write event at slot 107
Gating Logic:
Producer Sequence: 107
Consumer A Sequence: 105
Consumer B Sequence: 102 ← Slowest (gating sequence)
Ring Buffer Size: 8
Producer can advance to: 102 + 8 = 110
This provides backpressure — fast producers can't overwhelm slow consumers.
Cache-Line Optimization¶
The Disruptor uses padding to prevent false sharing:
// Without padding: False sharing
struct Bad {
std::atomic<int64_t> producer_seq;
std::atomic<int64_t> consumer_seq; // Same cache line!
};
// With padding: No false sharing
alignas(64) std::atomic<int64_t> producer_seq;
alignas(64) std::atomic<int64_t> consumer_seq;
FLOX uses alignas(64) throughout EventBus:
alignas(64) std::atomic<bool> _running{false};
alignas(64) std::atomic<int64_t> _next{-1};
alignas(64) std::atomic<int64_t> _cachedMin{-1};
// ...
alignas(64) std::array<ConsumerSlot, MaxConsumers> _consumers{};
alignas(64) std::array<std::atomic<int64_t>, MaxConsumers> _gating{};
Busy-Spin vs. Blocking¶
Consumers use configurable backoff with three modes:
enum class BackoffMode {
AGGRESSIVE, // Dedicated colo: busy-spin with CPU pause, minimal yields
RELAXED, // Shared VPS/cloud: early sleep, minimal CPU burn
ADAPTIVE // Auto-adjust: starts aggressive, backs off under contention
};
BusyBackoff backoff(BackoffMode::ADAPTIVE); // Default
AGGRESSIVE — for dedicated hardware with isolated cores:
- 2048 spins with CPU pause
- Then yield, reset at 4096
RELAXED — for shared VPS/cloud environments:
- 8 spins, then yield
- Sleep 100μs after 16 spins
- Sleep 500μs for sustained idle
ADAPTIVE (default) — auto-adjusts based on contention:
- 128 spins with CPU pause (low-latency burst handling)
- 512 spins with yield (medium contention)
- Sleep 10μs up to 2048 spins
- Sleep 100μs and reset to medium level
This balances latency (busy-spin) with CPU usage (sleep) based on deployment environment.
Multiple Consumers¶
FLOX supports multiple consumers per bus:
flowchart LR
subgraph Producer
P[Connector Thread]
end
subgraph RB[Ring Buffer]
direction LR
S0[E0] --- S1[E1] --- S2[E2] --- S3[E3]
end
subgraph Consumers[Consumer Threads]
C1[Strategy A<br/>seq=5]
C2[Strategy B<br/>seq=3]
C3[Logger<br/>seq=2]
end
P -->|publish| RB
RB -->|deliver| C1
RB -->|deliver| C2
RB -->|deliver| C3
style C3 fill:#fdd
tradeBus->subscribe(strategyA.get());
tradeBus->subscribe(strategyB.get());
tradeBus->subscribe(logger.get());
Each consumer:
- Gets a dedicated thread
- Maintains its own sequence
- Processes events independently
The producer waits for the slowest consumer before overwriting.
Required vs. Optional Consumers¶
// Required (default): affects backpressure
tradeBus->subscribe(strategyA.get(), /*required=*/true);
// Optional: does not gate wrap, but still gates the reclaim fence by default
tradeBus->subscribe(logger.get(), /*required=*/false);
Optional consumers:
- Do not gate the producer at wrap, but the reclaim fence still scans every
consumer (use-after-free protection), so by default a slow optional consumer
DOES stall
publish(). EnabledropBehindOptionalinHealthConfigto let them jump ahead instead. - With
dropBehindOptional, may miss events if too slow (skipped events are counted, never silently lost); without it, they block rather than miss. - Useful for monitoring, logging, metrics
Batch Publishing¶
WebSocket feeds already deliver batches: a depth message carries every level
that changed, and a busy trade stream packs several trades into one frame.
publishBatch keeps that shape instead of splitting it into per-event
publishes:
// evs is a contiguous array, count <= CapacityPow2 / 2
int64_t lastSeq = tradeBus->publishBatch(evs, count);
One call reserves the whole sequence range at once, waits once for ring
space, then stamps every slot under a single release fence. Per-event
publish() pays a sequence reservation, a wrap check and a release store
for every event; the batch pays each of those once. On our benchmark
hardware that is the difference between ~19M and ~275M events/s with one
consumer (benchmarks/batch_delivery_benchmark.cpp).
Batching costs nothing on the latency side. A batch is whatever the producer already has in hand, so a single event still goes through alone, and delivery latency under bursty load measures the same as the per-event path.
Consumers batch on their own: a consumer that wakes up delivers the whole contiguous run of published events (up to 1024) and stores its progress once at the end of the run, instead of updating two atomics per event. This works for both publish paths and needs nothing from the caller.
Static Subscription¶
subscribe() takes a listener interface pointer and dispatches through a
virtual call. subscribeStatic takes a concrete type instead:
struct PriceLogger
{
void onTrade(const TradeEvent& ev) { /* ... */ }
};
PriceLogger logger;
tradeBus->subscribeStatic(&logger);
The consumer loop is instantiated around the concrete type, so the handler call is direct and can inline. The type only needs the handler methods the event's dispatcher calls; it does not have to derive from the listener interface. On a live bus the difference is small, because the producer side dominates. The same mechanism is what makes StrategyPump fast in replay, where there is no producer to hide behind.
Performance Characteristics¶
| Metric | Notes |
|---|---|
| Publish latency | Wait-free when the ring has space; blocks with backoff (see Degradation) when a consumer lags |
| Consume latency | Depends on backoff strategy and load |
| Throughput | Limited by slowest consumer |
| Memory overhead | Fixed: sizeof(Event) × Capacity |
Actual numbers depend heavily on: - CPU architecture and cache hierarchy - Whether cores are isolated - Event size and consumer callback complexity - System load
Run benchmarks on your target hardware to establish baseline.
When Disruptor Shines¶
Good fit:
- High-throughput, low-latency requirements
- Predictable memory usage
- Single producer, multiple consumers
- Events are processed in order
Not ideal for:
- Multiple producers (requires coordination)
- Unbounded queues
- Very uneven consumer speeds
Configuration¶
// Custom capacity and consumer limit
using MyBus = EventBus<TradeEvent,
/*CapacityPow2=*/16384,
/*MaxConsumers=*/32>;
Capacity must be a power of 2 (for fast modulo via bitmask).
Degradation modes and consumer health¶
A stalled consumer freezes the whole bus, and without instrumentation it freezes silently. Configure the health layer if you run the bus anywhere a frozen publisher costs money.
Why a single consumer can stop everything: a required consumer that stops
advancing blocks the publisher at wrap gating, and an optional one blocks
it at the reclaim fence, because use-after-free protection waits for every
consumer before destroying old events. In both cases the publisher spins in
publish() and nothing in the logs says why.
The health layer gives each failure mode a detector and a policy:
- Stalls.
checkHealth()sweeps all consumers and fires the callback withSTALLEDwhen one has pending work but no progress forstallThreshold, thenHEALTHYagain on recovery. Call it from your own health thread or setenableMonitorThreadto poll automatically. One sweeping thread at a time; the bookkeeping is not synchronized between checkers. - Slow optional consumers. With
dropBehindOptional, an optional consumer more thandropBehindSlackevents behind jumps to the head instead of blocking the reclaim fence. The skipped count is instats().droppedBehind. Required consumers never drop events. - Dead consumers. A handler that throws kills its consumer loop and logs an
error. Swallowing the exception would keep a broken handler running, and
rethrowing would terminate the process, so the consumer dies and the next
sweep reports
DEAD. For a required consumer,deadPolicypicks betweenALERTandSTOP_BUS.
MyBus::HealthConfig cfg;
cfg.stallThreshold = std::chrono::milliseconds(50);
cfg.dropBehindOptional = true;
cfg.enableMonitorThread = true;
cfg.callback = [](uint32_t idx, MyBus::ConsumerHealth st, void*) { /* metrics */ };
bus.setHealthConfig(cfg); // before start()
Further Reading¶
- LMAX Disruptor Paper
- Memory Model — How FLOX handles event ownership
- Architecture Overview — Full system design